Sunday, 19 November 2017

One to look out for in 2018

A paper by Asst Prof Dr Oktay Dumankaya titled “2014 Myndos Eastern Harbour Bathymetric Study and First Assessment” is due to be published in March 2018’s edition of the International Journal of Nautical Archaeology. The paper is available to preview now (pay to view) at onlinelibray.wiley

I was fortunate enough to see an early draft of the paper, it compares the bathymetric features surveyed by Lt Cdr Graves RN in 1837 (UKHO chart 1531) and the results of digital bathymetric survey of the harbour in 2014.

Additionally but not directly associated with Gümüşlük or Myndos is another paper (which I missed first time around) by Dr Dumankaya describing five harbour structures, six piers, and a breakwater on Salih Island (north of Torba opposite Güvercinlik and Kuyucak Mevkii.)

Google Maps (pointer identifies the island not the site of the reported harbour structures)

The paper (in Turkish) was given at the 2nd International Symposium Of Turgut Reis And Turkish Maritime History in Nov 2013 and titled “Salih Adasi (Karyandaantik Kenti ?) Liman Araştirmasi” “Salih Island (The Ancient City Of Karyanda?) Harbor Research” and is available to download as a PDF from and

Bu makalenin konusunu Muğla ili, Bodrum ilçesi idari sınırları içerisinde yer alan Salih Adası (Karyanda Antik Kenti ?) limanyapıları oluşturmaktadır. Söz konusu adanın kıyı hattında, ada limanı ile ilişkili birçok yapı kalıntısı tespit edilmiştir. Bu yapı kalıntılarının Hellenistik ve Geç Antik Çağ’a ait olduğu görülmektedir. Tespit edilen liman yapılarının bölgedeki diğer örnekler ile karşılaştırmaları, tarihlendirmeleri ve bu yapı kalıntılarının hangi kente ait olduğunun sorgulanması makalenin konusunu oluşturmaktadır.
This article concerns with the harbour structures that Salih Island shoreline located in the Province of Muğla, district of Bodrum (The ancient city of Karyanda ?). Many remains of structures associated with the harbor have been identified at the costal line of the island. These structures might be dated back to the Hellenistic and late ancient period. Comparisons of identified harbor structures with other harbor structures in the region, dating of the structures and questioning of which city they belong to are the subject of this article.

Wednesday, 1 November 2017

Myndos (Asar Adasi) Geç Antik Dönem Seramikleri - Late Antiquity Pottery of (Asar Island) Myndos

One for the pot experts and those who know their Hayes classifications, a paper by Sinan Mimaroğlu Asst. Assoc. Dr. Mustafa Kemal University Antakya-Hatay, published in Ege University’s Journal of Art History  Vol XXVI Oct 17 and available to download from (only available in Turkish)


Ancient city of Myndos was one of Carian Cities in the antiquity and is located within the administrative boundaries of Gumusluk locality of Bodrum District in modern Turkey’s Muğla Province.

Apart from information recounted in works of antique and modern travelers, the very first study on this city was the underwater exploration conducted in and around Myndos by INA (Institute of Nautical Archaeology) in 1980 whereupon 10 amphoras, similar to those found in Yassiada Shipwreck which were aged for 4th century A.D. Underwater and surface studies were carried out between 2004 and 2006 which were led by Prof. Dr. Mustafa Sahin. The ground surveys carried out in 2008 revealed a monumental structure on Asar Island whereupon first scientific excavation works have started in 2009.*

The layers of structures beginning earliest from the Hellenistic period were revealed by the studies on the hill. In the Late Antiquity, basilica and houses and cisterns were built on top of the hill. The most recent layer features fortified walls dating the Late Byzantium Era.

Present study is the first that focuses on ceramics that were excavated between the years 2009-2013 from Asar Island (a.k.a. Rabbit Island) which overlooks the Myndos.

The ceramics examined in this study are from Late Antiquity of common wares and include cooking and heating pots, lids and Late Roman Red-Slip Wares. The ceramics provide important data concerning Late Antique settlements in the site and clues much needed to understand the fabric of the settlement. LATE_ANTIQUITY_POTTERY_OF_ASAR_ISLAND_MYNDOS

Saturday, 2 September 2017

Amphorae and Amphora Stamps of Myndos in the Hellenistic Period

Link to a poster titled Amphorae and Amphora Stamps of Myndos in the Hellenistic Period  on

The poster was presented by Gonca Gülsefa of Uludağ University at the International Association for Research on Pottery of Hellenistic Period (IARPotHP) conference in June this year.

Sunday, 6 August 2017

Drone flight over Kocadağ

A short YouTube clip of a drone flight over Kocadağ showing the remains of the Lelegian Wall with one of the lime kilns that probably contributed to the wall’s demise.

It's only just over 4 minutes long but for those with a short attention span you can scroll forward to 3:25 for a close up of the wall

Thursday, 1 June 2017

Two More Romans in Myndos circa 80 BC

During the search for information into Cassius’ time at Myndos I came across a reference to two more Romans residing in the city, Lucius Magius and Lucius Fannius.

L. Magius & L. Fannius, who were later to be declared enemies of the state by the Senate, had fought with Gaius Flavius Fimbria in the 1st Mithridian War. Following Fimbria’s death in 85 BC they sided with Mithridates before aligning themselves with Sulla.

At what point they moved to Myndos is unclear but they were living there circa 80 BC and are named in In Verrem Cicero’s trial of Gaius Verres (Cic. Ver. 2.1.86 – 88) which took place in Rome 10 years later.

Miletus had a fleet of 10 ships which were gifted or funded by Rome on the understanding that, when required, they could be called into service by the republic.

Verres, a legate in the service of Gnaeus Cornelius Dolabella governor of Cillicia, had requested a ship from the Milesian fleet to escort him to Myndos. In Cicero’s account “They immediately gave him a light vessel, a beautiful one of its class, splendidly adorned and armed”. On his arrival Verres sold the ship to Magius and Fannius, dismissing the Milesian captain and crew, directing them to return to Miletus by foot.

Cicero summing up the theft says:

 “O ye immortal gods! the incredible avarice, the unheard-of audacity of such a proceeding! Did you dare to sell a ship of the Roman fleet, which the city of Miletus had assigned to you to attend upon you?”

Magius’ and Fannius’ date of departure from Myndos is not recorded; however by 76 BC they were delivering letters from Mithridates to Quintus Sertorius in Italy, an action which resulted in the senate declaring them enemies of the state and issuing an order for them to be apprehended. They avoided capture, delivered Mithridates’ letters and were later documented sailing between Sertorius’ naval base at Dianium to Sinope in Portus to deliver Sertorius’ reply.

In the C. D Yonge translation on Perseus Tuft, Gaius Verres is referred to as Caius Verres but other sources use Gaius or Gaius (Caius).

The Yonge translation also refers to Lucius Magius’ partner as Lucius Rabius, most other sources I’ve seen name him as Lucius Fannius

M. Tullius Cicero. The Orations of Marcus Tullius Cicero, literally translated by C. D. Yonge. London. George Bell & Sons. 1903. Perseus Digital Library 


Monday, 22 May 2017

Cassius - The Battle of Myndos

AN630780001001CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 © Trustees of the British Museum

The silver denarius above, now held in the British Museum, was struck to celebrate Cassius’ capture of Rhodes following the battle of Myndus.

The design on the reverse of the coin shows the rose of Rhodes and an untied diadem on the left; with a crab, representing Cos, holding an aplustre, the ornamented stern post of a ship, in its claws, on the right.

Appian writing approximately 200 years later describes the battle in his The Civil Wars

App. BC 4.9.71 Perseus Digital Library at Tufts

"Alexander and Mnaseas, the Rhodian leaders, put to sea with their thirty-three ships against Cassius at Myndus, intending to surprise him by the suddenness of their attack. They built their hopes somewhat lightly on the supposition that by sailing against Mithridates at Myndus they had brought that war to a successful end. In order to display their seamanship they took their station the first day at Cnidus. The next day they showed themselves to the forces of Cassius on the high sea. The latter in astonishment put to sea against them, and it was a battle of strength and skill on both sides. The Rhodians with their light ships darted swiftly through the enemy's line, turned around, and attacked them in the rear. The Romans had heavier ships, and whenever they could come to close quarters they prevailed, as in an engagement on land, by their greater strength. Cassius, by reason of his more numerous fleet, was enabled to surround his enemy, and then the latter could no longer turn and dart through his line. When they could only attack in front and then haul off, their nautical skill was of no avail in the narrow space where they were confined. The ramming with their prows and broadside movements against the heavier Roman ships did little damage, while those of the Romans against the lighter vessels were more effective. Finally, three Rhodian ships were captured with their crews, two were rammed and sunk, and the remainder took flight to Rhodes in a damaged condition. All of the Roman ships returned to Myndus, where they were repaired, the greater part having suffered injury."

Contrary to what is written in some of the local websites and guides Cassius and Brutus did not flee to Myndos following the assassination of Julius Caesar. Cassius had been recruiting troops in Syria and had fought at Laodicea before arriving at Myndos. It is not known how long Cassius’ fleet was stationed at Myndos but Appian (4.9.65) states that as the Rhodians were renowned for their naval skills “he prepared his own ships with care, filled them with troops, and drilled them at Myndus”.

It seems highly unlikely that Brutus ever visited Myndos, at least during the period between the assassination and the final battle at Philippi. At the time Cassius was taking Rhodes Brutus was in Lycia.

Tuesday, 2 May 2017

Gümüşlük’s Silver Mine – Known Knowns and Known Unknowns

Back during the dark nights of winter with nothing better to do and having read the odd comment about the silver mine which gave Gümüşlük its name, I ran a series of internet searches to see if there were any online articles relating to mining activity in the area.

Spoiler Alert: there is no great reveal at the end of this post.

It is generally accepted that the name Gümüşlük harks back a tradition of silver mining in the area, Gümüş being the Turkish word for silver, but there are very few historical references to the mine or associated ore processing activities. G. E. Bean in Turkey beyond the Meander comments “The silver mines, traces of which have been found in the neighbourhood, and which have given its name to the village of Gümüşlük, are not mentioned in any ancient sources”.

The earliest reports I have been able to find come from W.R Paton and J.L. Myres.

William Roger Paton, classicist, author and translator of Greek texts regularly resided in Gümüşlük between 1885 and 1900.

John Linton Myres having graduated with a 1st in Greats, awarded a Burdett-Coutts scholarship in Geology and a Craven Fellowship, arranged to spend three months in 1893 with Paton at the family house in Gümüşlük.

Patton first mentions the mine in 1890 when describing his collection of silver Myndian drachmae “The existence in the territory of Myndus of a silver mine, which was, no doubt worked in antiquity...”

Several years later Paton and Myres in their Researches in Karia, published in 1987, describe “The great silver mine...” which can be seen in the hills behind the village. They go on to describe a large irregular shaft, which at the time was flooded with water to with 30ft of the surface, adding that there were still veins of “silver lead” in the neighbourhood.

They also mention that the beach to the south of the harbour was strewn with slag from silver furnaces and that they identified the remains of an exposed furnace approximately 4ft in diameter on the “hollow way” leading from the shoreline towards Kadikalesi.

In a later article published in 1920 Myres again refers to the mine at Gümüşlük “A large vein of silver ore close to Myndos was worked in later Greek times, and probably until the Turkish conquest, as the modern name Gumushlu indicates...”.

G.E. Bean and J.M. Cook whose comprehensive report on Myndos included in The Halicarnassus Peninsula only briefly mention the silver mine as a possible source of income in later times and refers to Paton’s & Myers’ Researches in Karia.

Comments in two more recent publications suggest that samples of ore from the Gümüşlük area have been analysed.

S. Wolf and others Lead Isotope Analyses of Islamic Pottery Glazes from Fusat, Egypt (2003) describing the comparisons of lead isotope ratios found in the glaze of lustre ware with that of ore sampled at three sites states that “...Gumusluk remains a possibility since there is evidence for silver extraction in the medieval period...”

S.P. Morris Daidalos and the Origins of Greek Art (1992): “Recent research has identified both ancient slag and mines, the latter in use until the twentieth century, near the site of ancient Myndus...”

Both of the above cite a 1986 paper by G. A. Wagner and others Geochemische und isotopische Charakteristika früher Rohstoffquellen für Kupfer, Blei, Silber und Gold in der Türkei (Geochemical and Isotopic Characteristics of Raw Materials for Copper, Lead, Silver and Gold in Turkey).

Unfortunately this document, published in the Yearbook of the Roman-Germanic Central Museum Vol 36, is not listed on the Museum’s online archive and does not appear to be available through any other open access sites.

The context in which the mine is referenced above covers a wide timescale. The work on lead glazes relates to pottery dated between 975 – 1025 AD and the chapter in Morris’ book, which mentions the mine, discusses possible Phoenician trade routes.

Morris’ comment that the mine was worked until the 20th century is questionable considering that Paton and Myres stated that the shaft was flooded in 1893 and none of the visitors earlier in the 19th century i.e. Capt F. Beaufort RN (1811-1812) Rev C.B. Elliot (1830s), Lt Cdr T. Graves RN (1837) or C.T. Newton (1857) made any reference to the evidence of mining activity in the area.

An ethnographical study conducted in 1967 by anthropologist June Starr may suggest that there is little or no oral history relating to the mine. Starr interviewed two residents, both in their 70s, and although they spoke about life in village before the foundation of the republic and one recalled an earlier history of the Greek settlers in the mid 19th century, Starr records no mention of mining.

In an article discussing mines in the Ottoman Sanjak of Menteşe (Muğla) during the 19th and 20th century, Arzu Baykara Taşkaya lists several registered mining claims in the area. These include a carborundum mine north of Bodrum and another at Karakaya, manganese mines at Dereköy, Konacık, Geriş and Peksimet, and “silver mines in the feet of Bozdağ of Peksimet village”. However it appears that none of these claims were worked due to low reserves.

There is also reference to a “silvery lead mine registered on behalf of the treasury around Karakaya village”; Gümüşlük is mentioned but only in regard to the etymology of the place name.

The term “silvery lead” and “silver lead” has cropped up several times, this along with the work on lead isotopes, may suggest that the mineral being mined was argentiferous galena, a lead ore which can contain up to 2% silver. There is evidence for the practice of processing galena, to separate the silver from the lead, in Asia Minor from as early as the 4th millennium BC.

So there you have it my known unknowns i.e. the location and period of operation, are still unresolved.

On the off chance that someone else may want to take this further I’ve listed the books and articles referred to above.

The missing link may be Wagner, G.A, E. Pernicka, and T.C Seeliger. "Geochemische Und Isotopische Charakteristika Früher Rohstoffquellen Für Kupfer, Blei, Silber Und Gold in Der Türkei."Jahrbuch Des Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums Mainz, 33.1986. The closest I got to this article is the University Library at Heidelberg but access appears to be restricted to students or members of associated institutions.

Bean, G. E. Turkey Beyond the Maeander. London: Murray, 1989.

Morris, S.P.Daidalos and the Origins of Greek Art, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995

Myres J.N.L “Commander J.L. Myres R.N.V.R. The Blackbeard of the Aegean” The Tenth J.L. Myres Memorial Lecture. London: Leopard’s Head Press, 1980

Starr, J. Dispute and Settlement in Rural Turkey: an ethnography of law. Leiden: Brill, 1978.

Baykara Taşkaya, A, “Chromium Mines in Köyceğiz and Mine Operation Grants In 19th And 20th Centuries” Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi,, Issue 31, 2011, pp. 69-83

Bean, G. E., and J. M. Cooke. "The Halicarnassus Peninsula." Annual of the British School at Athens 50 (1955): pp 85-171.

Myres, J. L. “The Dodecanese.” The Geographical Journal, vol. 56, no. 5, 1920, pp. 329–347.,

Paton, W. R. “Find of Coins near Halicarnassus.” The Numismatic Chronicle and Journal of the Numismatic Society, vol. 10, 1890, pp. 279–281.

Paton, W. R., and J. L. Myres. “Researches in Karia.” The Geographical Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, 1897, pp. 38–54.

Wolf, S. Stos, S. Mason, R. Tite, M. “Lead Isotope analyses of Islamic Pottery Glazes from Fustat, Egypt” Archaeometry vol 45. 3. 2003, pp. 405 – 420.